2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2003 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,816 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2003 GMC Sierra. (275 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2003 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Sierra weights approximately 233 kg more than 2004 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 GMC Sierra. (386 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Thunderbird | 2003 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | Thunderbird | Sierra |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3933 cc | 4816 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 275 HP |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 386 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 1945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3380 mm |
