2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2008 Mazda 5
To start off, 2008 Mazda 5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 5. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 102 kg more than 2008 Mazda 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 5. (360 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 2008 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | 5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 360 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 16.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |