2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2011 Saab 03-Sep. (180 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2011 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 2004 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (400 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Thunderbird. (388 Nm). This means 2011 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Thunderbird | 2011 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | Thunderbird | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3933 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 90.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 82 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |
