2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2012 Audi A6. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A6.
Because 2012 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Thunderbird | A6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 242 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |