2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP) has 170 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Because 2004 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (369 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Thunderbird | Cruze |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 369 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2685 mm |