2004 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2013 Volvo XC60. (237 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo XC60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 39 kg more than 2004 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2004 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (369 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo XC60. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo XC60.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Thunderbird | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Thunderbird | XC60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 369 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1791 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2774 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |