2004 Ford Transit Connect vs. 1980 Ford Cougar
To start off, 2004 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Cougar weights approximately 196 kg more than 2004 Ford Transit Connect.
Because 1980 Ford Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Transit Connect | 1980 Ford Cougar | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Transit Connect | Cougar |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 4186 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2760 mm |