2004 Ford Transit Connect vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 222 kg more than 2004 Ford Transit Connect.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Transit Connect. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Transit Connect | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Transit Connect | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Panel Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1752 cc | 4228 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2390 mm |
