2004 Ford Transit Connect vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200
To start off, 2004 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 294 more horse power than 2004 Ford Transit Connect. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Transit Connect. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 weights approximately 121 kg more than 2004 Ford Transit Connect. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Transit Connect | 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Transit Connect | F200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 5987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 408 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1405 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |