2004 GMC Canyon vs. 1977 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 765 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (251 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 1977 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Canyon | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2480 mm |