2004 GMC Canyon vs. 1982 Lancia Beta
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Beta. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 919 kg more than 1982 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (305 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Beta. (134 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 1982 Lancia Beta | |
Make | GMC | Lancia |
Model | Canyon | Beta |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 134 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1036 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 59 L |