2004 GMC Canyon vs. 1982 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1982 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (305 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 1982 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | GMC | Mercury |
Model | Canyon | Lynx |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 121 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 43 L |