2004 GMC Canyon vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP) has 367 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Because 2004 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm) has 391 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | GMC | Jaguar |
Model | Canyon | XJ220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 542 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 642 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 340 mm |