2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2002 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MG ZT-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MG ZT-T would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2002 MG ZT-T. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2002 MG ZT-T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 330 kg more than 2002 MG ZT-T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (305 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MG ZT-T. (250 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MG ZT-T.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 2002 MG ZT-T | |
Make | GMC | MG |
Model | Canyon | ZT-T |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 82.8 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2830 mm |