2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 176 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 1155 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (305 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | GMC | Subaru |
Model | Canyon | R2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 58 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 30 L |