2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, both 2004 GMC Canyon and 2004 MCC Crossblade were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 985 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (251 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Canyon | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | GMC | MCC |
| Model | Canyon | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 1810 mm |
