2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2010 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Impala. (211 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Impala. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 342 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Impala. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (305 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Impala. (293 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 2010 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | GMC | Chevrolet |
Model | Canyon | Impala |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 211 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 293 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 64 L |