2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (310 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 704 kg more than 2004 GMC Canyon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-150 (494 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2010 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Canyon | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | GMC | Ford |
| Model | Canyon | F-150 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 310 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 494 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 2659 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5611 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2192 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1991 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3378 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 98 L |
