2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2010 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2010 GMC Yukon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Yukon (320 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Yukon weights approximately 578 kg more than 2004 GMC Canyon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Yukon (454 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2010 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 2010 GMC Yukon | |
Make | GMC | GMC |
Model | Canyon | Yukon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 320 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 454 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 2533 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1953 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 98 L |