2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Canyon | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | GMC | Jaguar |
| Model | Canyon | XF |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |
