2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 120 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 2. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 909 kg more than 2011 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (305 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 2. (133 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Canyon | 2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 133 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 43 L |