2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 200 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 320 kg more than 2012 Audi R8.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (430 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | GMC | Audi |
Model | Canyon | R8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 430 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1252 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 90 L |