2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 158 kg more than 2013 Dodge CHARGER.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Canyon | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | GMC | Dodge |
| Model | Canyon | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 288 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 83 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1797 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3052 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 72 L |
