2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Compass. (156 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 561 kg more than 2013 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (305 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (191 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Canyon | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | GMC | Jeep |
| Model | Canyon | Compass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 156 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1394 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2634 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 51 L |
