2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL (423 HP) has 203 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL weights approximately 490 kg more than 2004 GMC Canyon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL (700 Nm) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL | |
Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Canyon | GL |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 423 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 700 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 2445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2141 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3075 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |