2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP) has 156 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 349 kg more than 2004 GMC Canyon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Canyon | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | GMC | Toyota |
| Model | Canyon | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 376 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 102 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5329 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1935 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3220 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 16.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 100 L |
