2004 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Volvo S80
To start off, 2013 Volvo S80 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S80 (296 HP) has 121 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S80 weights approximately 104 kg more than 2004 GMC Canyon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S80 (441 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Canyon | 2013 Volvo S80 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Canyon | S80 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 296 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 441 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1829 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1861 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1493 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2835 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |