2004 GMC Envoy vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Envoy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Envoy would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Envoy (275 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Envoy should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2004 GMC Envoy is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Envoy will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Envoy (374 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Envoy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Envoy | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | GMC | Ford |
| Model | Envoy | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 374 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 57 L |
