2004 GMC Envoy vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Envoy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Envoy would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2004 GMC Envoy. (275 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Envoy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Envoy weights approximately 654 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Because 2004 GMC Envoy is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lotus Evora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Envoy will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (400 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Envoy. (373 Nm). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Envoy.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Envoy | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | GMC | Lotus |
Model | Envoy | Evora |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 345 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 400 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2094 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4361 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2575 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 60 L |