2004 GMC Safari vs. 1982 Lincoln Mark VI
To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lincoln Mark VI would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Lincoln Mark VI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Safari (191 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lincoln Mark VI weights approximately 27 kg more than 2004 GMC Safari.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Lincoln Mark VI (359 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Safari. (339 Nm). This means 1982 Lincoln Mark VI will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Safari | 1982 Lincoln Mark VI | |
Make | GMC | Lincoln |
Model | Safari | Mark VI |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 5733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 359 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1793 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 68 L |