2004 GMC Safari vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle

To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Safari (191 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (96 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Safari weights approximately 628 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Caravelle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (159 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.

Compare all specifications: