2004 GMC Safari vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Safari (191 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Safari weights approximately 968 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Safari | 1982 Skoda L | |
Make | GMC | Skoda |
Model | Safari | L |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 74 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 68.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1793 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 38 L |