2004 GMC Safari vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2004 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Safari weights approximately 982 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2004 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Safari | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Safari | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 216 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 65 L |