2004 GMC Safari vs. 1997 Mazda Midge

To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Safari (191 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Safari weights approximately 827 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.

Compare all specifications: