2004 GMC Safari vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Safari (191 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 112 kg more than 2004 GMC Safari.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 GMC Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Safari | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | GMC | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Safari | SSU |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 119 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1793 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 71 L |
