2004 GMC Safari vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2004 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Safari weights approximately 1017 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2004 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Safari | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Safari | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 228 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 211 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 1065 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 61 L |