2004 GMC Safari vs. 2011 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2011 Lotus Evora is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lotus Evora (276 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2004 GMC Safari. (191 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Safari.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Lotus Evora (349 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Safari. (339 Nm). This means 2011 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Safari | 2011 Lotus Evora | |
Make | GMC | Lotus |
Model | Safari | Evora |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 276 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 349 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1222 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2576 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 59 L |