2004 GMC Safari vs. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Safari would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 909 more horse power than 2004 GMC Safari. (191 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Safari weights approximately 503 kg more than 2012 Koenigsegg Agera.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Safari | 2012 Koenigsegg Agera | |
Make | GMC | Koenigsegg |
Model | Safari | Agera |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 1100 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1793 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2660 mm |