2004 GMC Savana vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2004 GMC Savana is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW X5 would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Savana (295 HP) has 114 more horse power than 2002 BMW X5. (181 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 198 kg more than 2002 BMW X5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (448 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW X5. (391 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Savana | 2002 BMW X5 | |
Make | GMC | BMW |
Model | Savana | X5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5326 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 181 HP |
Torque | 448 Nm | 391 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2353 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 93 L |