2004 GMC Savana vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2004 GMC Savana. (295 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 204 kg more than 2004 GMC Savana. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (448 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover. (440 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Savana | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | GMC | Land Rover |
Model | Savana | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5326 cc | 4394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 305 HP |
Torque | 448 Nm | 440 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2353 kg | 2557 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 88 L |