2004 GMC Savana vs. 2009 Chevrolet Uplander
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Savana (295 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Uplander. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Uplander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 7 kg more than 2004 GMC Savana.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (448 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Uplander. (325 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Uplander.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Savana | 2009 Chevrolet Uplander | |
Make | GMC | Chevrolet |
Model | Savana | Uplander |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5326 cc | 3880 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 448 Nm | 325 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2353 kg | 2360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 95 L |