2004 GMC Savana vs. 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche (310 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2004 GMC Savana. (285 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 1276 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche (454 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Savana. (441 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Savana | 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | GMC | Chevrolet |
Model | Savana | Avalanche |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 310 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 454 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2537 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 117 L |