2004 GMC Savana vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Savana (295 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 5. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 775 kg more than 2010 Mazda 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (448 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 5. (200 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Savana | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Savana | 5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5326 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 448 Nm | 200 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2353 kg | 1578 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1753 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 60 L |