2004 GMC Savana vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Savana (295 HP) has 184 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (111 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 1135 kg more than 2010 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (448 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (151 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Savana | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | GMC | Renault |
Model | Savana | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5326 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 111 HP |
Torque | 448 Nm | 151 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 80.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2353 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 55 L |