2004 GMC Savana vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL (523 HP) has 238 more horse power than 2004 GMC Savana. (285 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 692 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL (800 Nm) has 359 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Savana. (441 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Savana | 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Savana | SL |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 523 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 800 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2537 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4633 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2099 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2585 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.9 L/100km |