2004 GMC Sierra vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 2004 GMC Sierra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 5,963 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (325 HP) has 274 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1304 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (502 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Sierra | 1952 Holden FX | |
| Make | GMC | Holden |
| Model | Sierra | FX |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5963 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 502 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2130 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2620 mm |
