2004 GMC Sierra vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 GMC Sierra is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1560 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (489 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Sierra | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | GMC | Triumph |
| Model | Sierra | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 489 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2730 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4250 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 64 L |
