2004 GMC Sierra vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 GMC Sierra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,963 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 792 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2004 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Sierra | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | GMC | Oldsmobile |
Model | Sierra | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5963 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1482 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2130 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2760 mm |