2004 GMC Sierra vs. 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2004 GMC Sierra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 622 kg more than 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (488 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace. (226 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Sierra | 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
Make | GMC | Toyota |
Model | Sierra | Hi-Ace |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 488 Nm | 226 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2337 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1960 mm |