2004 GMC Sierra vs. 2008 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 708 kg more than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (370 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda CR-V. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Sierra | 2008 Honda CR-V | |
Make | GMC | Honda |
Model | Sierra | CR-V |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 370 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2270 kg | 1562 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 13.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 58 L |